$70,000 a Year: The Policy vs Buy Term and Invest

Generated May 25, 2026  |  Two plans for Alyssa, same $70,000 a year, both protect the family with $10,000,000
You have $70,000 a year set aside. Both plans below cost exactly that, and both pay $10,000,000 if Alyssa dies. The only real difference is how much money you build on the side while alive, and who controls it. Plan B builds about twice as much, and you own all of it.

Plan A: The insurance policy (what Diamond pitched)

You pay$70,000 / year
Family gets if she dies$10,000,000 *
Money you can take out by year 20$2,619,810
Who controls itInsurer + bank
The catchGains capped, a bank funds most of the premium, the policy borrows against itself, lock-up and fees

Plan B: Buy term, invest the rest

You pay$6,765 term + $63,235 invested = $70,000 / year
Family gets if she dies$10,000,000
Money you can take out by year 20$5,388,764
Who controls itYou
The catchTerm ends at age 65; by then the account is your self-insurance

Money you have built by year 20

What you could actually take out after 20 years, for the same $70,000 a year. Both plans also pay $10,000,000 if Alyssa dies during the term. Policy figure is the surrender value from Diamond's illustration (prop-alyssa.pdf). Term-plus-invest figure is $63,234.90 a year in an S&P 500 index fund over the actual returns of 2005 to 2024.

Why is the policy's number so much smaller? Two reasons.

Reason 1: the cap. The policy only credits market gains up to a cap each year, with a 0% floor in down years. It sounds safe, but the market makes most of its money in a few giant up years, and the cap clips exactly those. Skipping a couple of crashes does not make up for missing every big rally. The table below shows it on the real years.
YearWhat the S&P did (price)What a capped policy keepsDifference

"Capped policy keeps" = the S&P price change, limited to a 10% cap (assumption, the policy's real cap is not printed on the illustration) and floored at 0%. Source for yearly returns: Wikipedia "S&P 500" annual returns table.

Reason 2: the loan. Diamond's illustration shows a $9,793,188 "accumulation value" at year 20, which looks great. But that is the gross number. The policy borrows about $7,173,378 against itself (around year 15 it takes a $4,985,975 distribution to pay off the bank loan). What you could actually take out, the illustration's own surrender value, is $2,619,810 (prop-alyssa.pdf). The $9.79M is mostly offset by the loan.
Question for Diamond. The illustration shows a $12,619,810 gross death benefit at year 20, but if there is roughly a $7,173,378 loan against the policy, confirm what actually reaches the family after the loan is repaid. The $10,000,000 term policy has no loan against it, so the family gets the full amount.

The honest caveats

Sources

  1. $70,000/year out of pocket, $9,793,188.63 accumulation value, $2,619,810.44 surrender value, $12,619,810.44 gross death benefit (all year 20), and the $4,985,975 year-15 distribution: Diamond Patni illustration, prop-alyssa.pdf, 5/4/2026 (attached to Gmail msg 19e5178bbc33061e, hemani.ali@gmail.com).
  2. Term premium $6,765.10/year for $10M, 30-year level, female age 35, Preferred, non-tobacco: term4sale.com (Compulife), pulled May 25, 2026.
  3. Invested amount $63,234.90/year = $70,000 minus $6,765.10. Index result $5,388,764 = that invested at S&P 500 total returns, 2005 to 2024 (Wikipedia "S&P 500" annual returns table). Total contributed: $1,264,698.
  4. Loan against the policy $7,173,378.19 = $9,793,188.63 accumulation minus $2,619,810.44 surrender. Difference in accessible money $2,768,953.56 = $5,388,764 minus $2,619,810.44.